Encyclopedia Virginia: The Blog header image

This Day (Peace, Love, and Slavery Edition)

May 30th, 2013 by Brendan Wolfe · 1 Comment

Also on this day in 1854, United States president Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act into law. The whole point of the law was to let the states decide for themselves the question of slavery. With no “evil” federal government telling them what to do, then the whole ugly problem might disappear once and for all. As Ron Paul famously suggested a couple of years ago, no war was necessary, right?

That was Stephen A. Douglas‘s reasoning. He was the pint-sized Illinois senator who coined the phrase “popular sovereignty,” and he figured that while planters might drag their chattel north to test out the midwestern soil, they’d find it ill-suited to their purposes. Like gentlemen, they would then retreat south and let the Jayhawks and Cornhuskers count their labor free.

Except that they didn’t. And the whole issue only underscores the problems with states’ rights as understood by Candidate Paul. The Democrats and Whigs in Congress were so divided on the issue that, according to one historian, the South’s “margin of victory was accounted for by the provision in the Constitution [that] gave additional representation to slaveholding states by allowing them to count each slave as three-fifths of a person.”*

In other words, the “evil” federal government acted only with the power it won on the backs of slaves. And maintaining that power required maintaining, even expanding, slavery—the poor quality of Jayhawk soil be damned. Perhaps this is why Henry A. Edmundson, a Democrat from Blacksburg, pulled two pistols from his jacket and aimed them at the head of Lewis D. Campbell of Ohio. This was on the floor of Congress during debate over Kansas-Nebraska.

RON PAUL: Every other major country of the world was able to get rid of slavery without a civil war. So the Civil War wasn’t fought over slavery …

The United States, however, has always been exceptional. After all, not every other country in the world boasted the likes of Henry Alonzo Edmundson.

* This does not make the three-fifths clause “anti-slavery” as Bishop E. W. Jackson, the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor, has suggested. To the contrary, it was designed to empower southerners in Congress beyond what their actual population warranted. It was the definition of un-democratic, and it was designed to guarantee the livelihoods of slaveholders.

A version of this post was originally published on May 30, 2011.

Tags: This Day

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 Mark Curran // Jun 16, 2014 at 4:46 pm

    If you think Douglas got Kansas Nebraska Bill passed, to effect “popular sovereignty” I wouldn’t be so sure.

    Yeah, yeah, he talked that way — at times. He gave the most amazing speeches possible on it, in Congress, and out. But do you know who held up the Topeka Constitution, so that LeCompton could get passed? Douglas, as Chairman of Kansas Territory.

    And do you know who at first wanted to accept the Lecompton fraud to pass — until he heard defening outrage from people who knew (because of the telegraph, actually) what a violent fraud it was? Douglas.

    And do you know who sent those armed troops into Kansas, and boasted of stopping free speech against slavery, in 1856, May 21?

    Douglas good friend and partner on Kansas Nebraska Bill, David Rice Atchison.

    If you want to find out more, read David Atchison’s speech to his men before the Lawrence KS raid –the first of several. He makes it very clear who sent him, who paid for it, and what their goal was.

    WHo paid him? Jefferson Davis. What was the goal? To stop free speech against slavery.

    What was their goal? To spread slavery into KS, despite 98% of the white males eventually voting AGAINST slavery.

    Sound like Douglas was really concerned about popular sovereignty?

    Even after the horrors of Atchison’s raids and terror trips, Douglas continued to claim Atchison was “the kindest and most patriotic man I have ever met”.

    True, Douglas came around to reject Lecompton fraud, but only AFTER he saw he was on a political suicide mission to defend it, though he had a hand in bring it to be.

    Here is a link to Atchison’s speech, study it closely. It’s the best history lesson you will likely see on the subject, because he is bragging of the killing and terror he was sent to cause.

Leave a Comment

 

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing